Comparativist Philosophy of Science and Population Viability Assessment in Biology: Helping Resolve Scientific Controversy

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):817-828 (2006)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/518634
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Deborah G. Mayo (2001). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):455-459.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Arno Wouters (1995). Viability Explanation. Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.
William Goodwin (2012). Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs025.
John Matthewson (2011). Trade-Offs in Model-Building: A More Target-Oriented Approach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):324-333.
Ronald Munson (1975). Is Biology a Provincial Science? Philosophy of Science 42 (4):428-447.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #424,619 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.