David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Speech acts have sometimes been considered as unembeddable, for principled reasons. In this paper, I argue that speech acts can be embedded under certain circumstances. In particular, I consider denegation and conjunction of speech acts, quantification into speech acts, conditionalization of speech acts, the embedding of speech acts by verbs like say and wonder, speechact-modifying adverbials like frankly, clauses commenting on speech acts, like certain uses of because-clauses, parentheticals, and appositive relative clauses. A crucial distinction is made between speech acts and speech act potentials, linguistic objects that can be used to perform speech acts when applied in a specific communicative situation. I develop a semantic theory in which speech act potentials are captured as semantic functions that change a world-time index, reflecting the nature of speech acts as events that happen in the world. As index changers, speech act potentials become nearly regular semantic objects, with a proper semantic type on which other semantic objects can operate on. In this way, speech acts (or rather, speech-act potentials) become part of the recursive structure of language.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Alwood (forthcoming). Non-Descriptive Negation for Normative Sentences. Philosophical Quarterly:pqv067.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (2001). Indirect Speech Acts. Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
Friedrich Christoph Dörge (2000). Illokutionäre Akte und Konventionalität. Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:125-150.
Wojciech Krysztofiak (2007). Spór o ontologię sytuacji jako spór o zasadę kompozycyjności. Argument z metafory. Filozofia Nauki 4.
Stefanov Gheorghe (2010). Negative Acts. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti - Filosofie (LIX):3-9.
Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith (1990). Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
Mitchell Green, Speech Acts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mary Kate McGowan (2009). Oppressive Speech. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Maciej Witek (2013). Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Acts. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (1):129-141.
Nicole Wyatt (2009). Failing to Do Things with Words. Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (2004). Voices and Noises in the Theory of Speech Acts. Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (1):105-151.
Caleb Yong (2011). Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech? Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) (1994). Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge.
Dirk Greimann & Geo Siegwart (eds.) (2007). Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
Roy Turner (1985). Speech and the Social Contract. Inquiry 28 (1-4):43 – 53.
Added to index2011-03-19
Total downloads97 ( #41,341 of 1,796,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #136,212 of 1,796,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?