David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):60-82 (2001)
of democratizing social inquiry by actively engaging the subject in the design and conduct of research. Drawing on four examples of PAR-based social science and a democratic reconstruction of "epistemic privilege," this article argues that philosophers need to take seriously PAR's notion that democratic norms should guide social inquiry. But it does not advocate replacing mainstream or expert-directed social science by PAR. Instead, it maintains that it is both possible and sensible for PAR practitioners to collaborate with conventional research. Indeed, certain forms of nonparticipatory social science seem indispensable for any extensive application of the PAR framework. The article concludes by drawing out its (controversial) implications for two central issues in the philosophy of social science: first, that the methods of social inquiry are distinct from those in the natural sciences and, second, that there is a sense in which social research can and should be "value neutral.".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ramkrishna Mukherjee & Partha N. Mukherji (eds.) (2000). Methodology in Social Research: Dilemmas and Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Ramkrishna Mukherjee. Sage Publications, Inc..
Annamaria Carusi (2012). The Ethical Work That Regulations Will Not Do. Information, Communication and Society 15 (1):124-141.
Margareta Bertilsson (1978). Towards a Social Reconstruction of Science Theory: Peirce's Theory of Inquiry, and Beyond. Bokcaféet (Distr.)].
Zuyi Du (2000). The Scientific Merit of the Social Sciences: Implications for Research and Application. Trentham Books.
James Bohman (1999). Theories, Practices, and Pluralism: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480.
Bent Flyvbjerg (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge University Press.
Mark B. Brown & David H. Guston (2009). Science, Democracy, and the Right to Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):351-366.
Richard Ned Lebow & Mark Irving Lichbach (eds.) (2007). Social Inquiry and Political Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandra Harding (1980). The Norms of Social Inquiry and Masculine Experience. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:305 - 324.
Francis Schrag (1983). Social Science and Social Practice. Inquiry 26 (1):107 – 124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #317,293 of 1,938,672 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #216,993 of 1,938,672 )
How can I increase my downloads?