Graduate studies at Western
Natural Language Semantics 9 (1):1-40 (2001)
|Abstract||Quantified NPs in questions may lead to an interpretation in which the NP quantifies into the question. Which dish did every guest bring? can be understood as: 'For every guest x: which dish did x bring?'. After a review of previous approaches that tried to capture this quantification formally or to explain it away, it is argued that such readings involve quantification into speech acts. As the algebra of speech acts is more limited than a Boolean algebra – it only contains conjunction, not disjunction or negation – it is predicted that only universal quantifiers can scope out of questions or other speech acts. The approach is extended to indirect questions, which either are embedded speech acts or coerced to denote the true answers, depending on the embedding verb; in the latter case a Boolean structure results, and we find wide-scope readings of non-universal quantifiers|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Stich (2001). Plato's Method Meets Cognitive Science. Free Inquiry 21 (2):36-38.
David Harrah (1961). A Logic of Questions and Answers. Philosophy of Science 28 (1):40-46.
Ruth Manor (1984). Dialogue Representation. Topoi 3 (1):63-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,521 of 739,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?