Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 141 (1):79-95 (2008)
|Abstract||The ontology of (merely) intentional objects is a can of worms. If we can avoid ontological commitment to such entities, we should. In this paper, I offer a strategy for accomplishing that. This is to reject the traditional act-object account of intentionality in favor of an adverbial account. According to adverbialism about intentionality, having a dragon thought is not a matter of bearing the thinking-about relation to dragons, but of engaging in the activity of thinking dragon-wise.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tim Crane (2001). Intentional Objects. Ratio 14 (4):298-317.
Tim Crane (2007). Intentionalism. In Ansgar Beckermann & Brian P. McLaughlin (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Dale Jacquette (1984). Sensation and Intentionality. Philosophical Studies 47 (3):229-40.
Uriah Kriegel (2007). Intentional Inexistence and Phenomenal Intentionality. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):307-340.
Werner Sauer (2006). Die Einheit der Intentionalitätskonzeption Bei Brentano. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):1-26.
Alberto Voltolini (1991). Objects as Intentional and as Real. Grazer Philosophische Studien 41:1-32.
Katalin Farkas (2010). Independent Intentional Objects. In Tadeusz Czarnecki, Katarzyna Kijanija-Placek, Olga Poller & Jan Wolenski (eds.), The Analytical Way. College Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads88 ( #10,197 of 750,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,338 of 750,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?