David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 62 (3):359-374 (2012)
This essay discusses a prominent definition of universal concomitance in the Nyäya School of Classical Indian Philosophy. This définition holds that universal concomitance is equivalent to the absence of undercutting conditions. It will be shown that though this definition seems to be inadequate, there is an auxiliary condition that may be added which makes the equivalence between universal concomitance and the absence of undercutting conditions deductively correct. It will then be shown that this auxiliary condition fits well into the Nyäya foundations of logic and that furthermore this auxiliary condition does not unreasonably restrict the applicability of the definition of universal concomitance as the absence of undercutting conditions. Hence, the conclusion is that this interpretation is a good candidate for how the definition of universal concomitance as the absence of undercutting conditions should be understood
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Krishna Chakraborty (1978). Determination of Universal Concomitance. Journal of Indian Philosophy 5 (4):291-310.
Michael Strevens (2009). Objective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
W. A. Parent (1983). A New Definition of Privacy for the Law. Law and Philosophy 2 (3):305 - 338.
Janina Kotarbinska (1960). On Ostensive Definitions. Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-22.
Paolo Vineis (1993). Definition and Classification of Cancer: Monothetic or Polythetic? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Kevin Inston (2009). Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Ernesto Laclau and the Somewhat Particular Universal. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):555-587.
James W. Mcallister (1999). Universal Regularities and Initial Conditions in Newtonian Physics. Synthese 120 (3):325-343.
Bengt Brülde (2010). On Defining “Mental Disorder”: Purposes and Conditions of Adequacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):19-33.
Nirmalya Guha (2013). No Black Scorpion is Falling: An Onto-Epistemic Analysis of Absence. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (2):111-131.
P. J. H. (1968). The Logic of Invariable Concomitance in the Tattvacintämani. Review of Metaphysics 22 (1):144-144.
P. T. Raju (1968). The Logic of Invariable Concomitance in The. Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (4):418-419.
John N. Martin (2013). Distributive Terms, Truth, and thePort Royal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):133-154.
Tomasz Bigaj (2005). Causes, Conditions and Counterfactuals. Axiomathes 15 (4):599-619.
Lee C. Rice (1968). The Logic of Invariable Concomitance in the Tattvacintamani. By C. Goekoop. Modern Schoolman 46 (1):82-82.
Paul Turner Hershey (1985). A Definition for Paternalism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):171-182.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-08-06
Total downloads2 ( #361,786 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?