Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):577-592 (2009)
|Abstract||I argue that creativity is compatible with determinism and therefore with naturalistic explanation. I explore different kinds of novelty, corresponding with four distinct concepts of creativity – anthropological, historical, psychological and metaphysical. Psychological creativity incorporates originality and spontaneity. Taken together, these point to the independence of the creative mind from social learning, experience and previously acquired knowledge. This independence is nevertheless compatible with determinism. Creativity is opposed to specific causal factors, but it does not exclude causal determination as such. So creativity can be naturalized.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Silvia Sacchetti & Roger Sugden, Knowledge Governance and Creativity in the Organisation of Production: What is in the Interests of 'Publics'?
Peter Carruthers (2011). Creative Action in Mind. Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):437 - 461.
Allan Combs & Stanley Krippner (2007). Structures of Consciousness and Creativity: Opening the Doors of Perception. In Ruth Richards (ed.), Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature: Psychological, Social, and Spiritual Perspectives. American Psychological Association.
Weihua Niu (2003). Ancient Chinese Views of Creativity. Inquiry 22 (3):29-36.
Dustin Stokes (2011). Minimally Creative Thought. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):658-681.
Robert Hanna (1983). The Nature of Creativity in Whitehead's Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:109-175.
René Víctor Valqui Vidal (2013). To Be Human is to Be Creative. AI and Society 28 (2):237-248.
Added to index2009-07-03
Total downloads101 ( #7,699 of 722,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?