Gentzen formulations of two positive relevance logics

Studia Logica 40 (3):381 - 403 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author gentzenizes the positive fragments T₊ and R₊ of relevant T and R using formulas with prefixes (subscripts). There are three main Gentzen formulations of $S_{+}\in \{T_{+},R_{+}\}$ called W₁ S₊, W₂ S₊ and G₂ S₊. The first two have the rule of modus ponens. All of them have a weak rule DL for disjunction introduction on the left. DL is not admissible in S₊ but it is needed in the proof of a cut elimination theorem for G₂ S₊. W₁ S₊ has a weak rule of weakening W₁ and it is not closed under a general transitivity rule. This allows the proof that $\vdash A$ in S₊ iff $\vdash A$ in W₁ S₊. From the cut elimination theorem for G₂ S₊ it follows that if $\vdash A$ in S₊, then $\vdash A$ in G₂ S₊. In order to prove the converse, W₂ S₊ is needed. It contains modus ponens, transitivity, and a restricted weakening rule. G₂ S₊ is contained in W₂ S₊ and there is a proof that $\vdash A$ in W₂ S₊ iff $\vdash A$ in W₁ S₊.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#253,024)

6 months
5 (#441,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Four relevant Gentzen systems.Steve Giambrone & Aleksandar Kron - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (1):55 - 71.
Gentzen systems and decision procedures for relevant logics.Steve Giambrone - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (3/4):169-174.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references