Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-15 (1992)
|Abstract||The purpose of this paper is to solve a serious problem for the projection postulate involving the time-energy uncertainty relation. The problem was recently raised by Teller, who believes that the problem is insoluble and, consequently, that the projection postulate should no longer be regarded as a serious focus for interpretive investigation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Constantin Antonopoulos (1997). Time as Non-Observational Knowledge: How to Straighten Out Δeδt≥H. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):165 – 183.
Paul Teller (1984). The Projection Postulate: A New Perspective. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (1982). The Reduction of Phenomenological to Kinetic Thermostatics. Philosophy of Science 49 (1):107-119.
Sergio Martinez (1990). A Search for the Physical Content of Luders' Rule. Synthese 82 (1):97 - 125.
Joseph D. Sneed (1966). Von Neumann's Argument for the Projection Postulate. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
Paul Teller (1980). The Projection Postulate and Bohr's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:201 - 223.
Geoffrey Hellman (1981). Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate. Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Paul Teller (1983). The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.
W. Michael Dickson (1995). Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,830 of 722,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?