Why are Software Patents so Elusive? A Platonic Approach
Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 5 (1):57-70 (2011)
| Abstract | Software patents are commonly criticised for being fuzzy, context-sensitive, and often granted for trivial inventions. More often than not, these shortcomings are said to be caused by the abstract nature of software - with little further analysis offered. Drawing on Plato’s Parmenides, this paper will argue (1) that the reason why software patents seem to be elusive is that patent law suggests to think about algorithms as paradigmatic examples and (2) that Plato’s distinction between two modes of predication and the role of competence in his account of knowledge are helpful not only for conceptualising knowledge of algorithms, but also for understanding the limits of software patent regimes. | |||||||||
| Keywords | software patents patent failure computer-implemented inventions algorithms reification Plato Bessen Meurer | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid M. Douglas (2011). The Social Disutility of Software Ownership. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):485-502.
Nurbay Irmak (forthcoming). Software is an Abstract Artifact. Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Justine Pila (2009). Patents. In Cane & Conaghan (ed.), The New Oxford Companion to Law.
R. Stephen Crespi (2000). An Analysis of Moral Issues Affecting Patenting Inventions in the Life Sciences: A European Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):157-180.
Peter Suber (1988). What is Software? Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2 (2):89-119.
Jacek Spławiński (2005). Patents and Ethics: Is It Possible to Be Balanced? Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1).
James Wilson (2007). GM Crops: Patently Wrong? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3).
Rohit Parikh (2002). Social Software. Synthese 132 (3):187 - 211.
Hans Radder (2004). Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
Timothy R. Colburn (1999). Software, Abstraction, and Ontology. The Monist 82 (1):3-19.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-05-09Total downloads8 ( #123,036 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,324 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
