Kierkegaardian intersubjectivity and the question of ethics and responsibility
| Abstract | Kierkegaardian Intersubjectivity and the Question of Ethics and Responsibility By Kevin Krumrei. Kierkegaard's contributions to philosophy are generally admitted and recognized as valuable in the history of Western philosophy, both as one of the great anti-Hegelians, as the founder (arguably) of existentialism, and as a religious thinker. However valid this may be, there is similarly a generally admitted critique of Kierkegaard in the Western tradition, that Kierkegaard's philosophy of the development of the self leads the individual into an isolated encounter with God, to the abandonment of the social context. In other words, a Kierkegaardian theory of intersubjectivity is a contradiction in terms. This is voiced eloquently by Emmanuel Levinas, among others. However, Levinas' own intersubjective ethics bears a striking resemblance to Kierkegaard's, with respect to the description and formulation of the basic problem for ethics: the problem of aesthetic egoism. Further, both Kierkegaard and Levinas follow similar paths in responding to the problem, from Kierkegaard's reduplication in Works of Love, to Levinas' notion of substitution in Otherwise than Being. In this comparison, it becomes evident that Levinas' reading of Kierkegaard is mistaken, for Kierkegaard's intersubjective ethics postulates, in fact, the inseparability and necessity of the self s responsible relation to others in the self s relation to God, found in the command, "you shall love your neighbour as yourself." | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Kemp Ryan (forthcoming). Making Sense of the Ethical Stage: Revisiting Kierkegaard’s Aesthetic-to-Ethical Transition. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook.
Richard J. Colledge (2004). Kierkegaard's Subjective Ontology. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):5-22.
C. Stephen Evans (1988). Kierkegaard and Plantinga on Belief in God. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):25-39.
Ryan Kemp (2011). Making Sense of the Ethical Stage: Revisiting Kierkegaard’s Aesthetic-to-Ethical Transition. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook.
Noel S. Adams (2009). Reconsidering the Relation Between God and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):247-258.
C. Stephen Evans (2004). Kierkegaard's Ethic of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations. Oxford University Press.
James M. McLachlan (2011). Beyond the Self, Beyond Ontology: Levinas' Reading of Shestov's Reading of Kierkegaard. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):179-196.
Patrick Stokes (2006). Kierkegaardian Vision and the Concrete Other. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (4):393-413.
Daniel Murphy (forthcoming). Levinas and Kierkegaard on Divine Transcendence and Ethical Life: Response to Donald L. Turner and Ford Turrell's “the Non-Existent God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):383-385.
Brian T. Prosser (2002). Conscientious Subjectivity in Kierkegaard and Levinas. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):397-422.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-21Total downloads11 ( #99,523 of 549,080 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

