Graduate studies at Western
Semiotica 188 (1/4):295-322 (2012)
|Abstract||In this paper, a formal theory is presented that describes syntactic and semantic mechanisms of philosophical discourses. They are treated as peculiar language systems possessing deep derivational structures called architectonic forms of philosophical systems, encoded in philosophical mind. Architectonic forms are constituents of more complex structures called architectonic spaces of philosophy. They are understood as formal and algorithmic representations of various philosophical traditions. The formal derivational machinery of a given space determines its class of all possible architectonic forms. Some of them stand under factual historical philosophical systems and they organize processes of doing philosophy within these systems. Many architectonic forms have never been realized in the history of philosophy. The presented theory may be interpreted as falling under Hegel’s paradigm of comprehending cultural texts. This paradigm is enriched and inspired with Propp’s formal, morphological view on texts. The peculiarity of this modification of the Hegel-Propp paradigm consists of the use of algebraic and algorithmic tools of modeling processes of cultural development. To speak metaphorically, the theory is an attempt at the mathematical and logical history of philosophy inspired by the Internet metaphor. And that is why it belongs to the tradition of doing metaphilosophy in The Lvov-Warsaw School, which is continued today mainly by Woleński, Pelc, Perzanowski, and Jadacki.|
|Keywords||Architectonic forms of philosophy architectonic spaces transformations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Albert Atkin, Peirce, Charles Sanders -- B. Architectonic Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John P. Anton (2007). Intelligibility in Nature, Art and Episteme. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:3-9.
C. D. N. Barel (1993). Concepts of an Architectonic Approach to Transformation Morphology. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4).
Rajiv Kaushik (2008). Architectonic and Myth Time. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:121-139.
Jon Stewart (1995). The Architectonic of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):747-776.
Leslie Jaye Kavanaugh (2007). The Architectonic of Philosophy: Plato, Aristotle, Leibniz. Amsterdam University Press.
B. P. R. (1981). Kant. The Architectonic and Development of His Philosophy. The Review of Metaphysics 34 (4):813-814.
Paula Manchester (2008). Kant's Conception of Architectonic in its Philosophical Context. Kant-Studien 99 (2):133-151.
Paula Manchester (2008). Kant's Conception of Architectonic in Its Philosophical Context. Kant Studien 99 (2):187-207.
Walter E. Schaller (1987). Kant's Architectonic of Duties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (2):299-314.
Stephen R. Palmquist (2011). Architectonic Reasoning and Interpretation in Kant and the Yijing. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (4):569-583.
Jose Ferrater Mora (1955). Peirce's Conception of Architectonic and Related Views. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (3):351-359.
Gerd Buchdahl (1966). The Relation Between 'Understanding' and 'Reason' in the Architectonic of Kant's Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67:209 - 226.
Paul St Denis & Patrick Grim (1997). Fractal Images of Formal Systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (2):181-222.
Govert Den Hartogh (1999). The Architectonic of Michael Walzer's Theory of Justice. Political Theory 27 (4):491-522.
Added to index2012-02-13
Total downloads74 ( #13,710 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #5,020 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?