The grammar of philosophical discourse

Semiotica 188 (1/4):295-322 (2012)
Abstract
In this paper, a formal theory is presented that describes syntactic and semantic mechanisms of philosophical discourses. They are treated as peculiar language systems possessing deep derivational structures called architectonic forms of philosophical systems, encoded in philosophical mind. Architectonic forms are constituents of more complex structures called architectonic spaces of philosophy. They are understood as formal and algorithmic representations of various philosophical traditions. The formal derivational machinery of a given space determines its class of all possible architectonic forms. Some of them stand under factual historical philosophical systems and they organize processes of doing philosophy within these systems. Many architectonic forms have never been realized in the history of philosophy. The presented theory may be interpreted as falling under Hegel’s paradigm of comprehending cultural texts. This paradigm is enriched and inspired with Propp’s formal, morphological view on texts. The peculiarity of this modification of the Hegel-Propp paradigm consists of the use of algebraic and algorithmic tools of modeling processes of cultural development. To speak metaphorically, the theory is an attempt at the mathematical and logical history of philosophy inspired by the Internet metaphor. And that is why it belongs to the tradition of doing metaphilosophy in The Lvov-Warsaw School, which is continued today mainly by Woleński, Pelc, Perzanowski, and Jadacki.
Keywords Architectonic forms of philosophy   architectonic spaces   transformations
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Wojciech Krysztofiak, The grammar of philosophical discourse
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
John P. Anton (2007). Intelligibility in Nature, Art and Episteme. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:3-9.
Rajiv Kaushik (2008). Architectonic and Myth Time. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:121-139.
Jon Stewart (1995). The Architectonic of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):747-776.
Walter E. Schaller (1987). Kant's Architectonic of Duties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (2):299-314.
Jose Ferrater Mora (1955). Peirce's Conception of Architectonic and Related Views. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (3):351-359.
Paul St Denis & Patrick Grim (1997). Fractal Images of Formal Systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (2):181-222.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-13

Total downloads

92 ( #12,581 of 1,098,832 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #57,571 of 1,098,832 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.