|Abstract||There are at least three sorts of difficulties that hamper successful promotion of the rule of law. Each of these would be lessened by integration of materials which RoL promoters commonly avoid. First, the rule of law depends upon many factors beyond what most lawyers know, or know how to know. These include non-state norms, attitudes, beliefs, practices and institutions. Secondly, this is not a peculiarity of societies where the rule of law is weak and in need of promotion, but true of all societies, including those of rule of law promoters. Recognition of this requires reconceptualisation of what is required for law to rule. And that, in turn, would benefit from integration of thought from domains and disciplines that RoL promoters have hitherto tended to consider other people’s business. Such disciplinary ecumenism might make them more alive to the ends of what they are trying to promote; less aimlessly tied to particular institutional means.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
James R. Maxeiner, The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.
Till Blume, Implementing the Rule of Law in Integrated Missions: Security and Justice in the UN Mission in Liberia.
Neil MacCormick (2001). Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:51-67.
Matthew H. Kramer (2007). Objectivity and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Colleen Murphy (2005). Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law. Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
James Fleming (ed.) (2011). Getting to the Rule of Law. New York University Press.
Added to index2009-05-24
Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,951 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,951 )
How can I increase my downloads?