Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 18 (3):343 - 378 (1982)
|Abstract||In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationships in general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; (Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness and truth approximation as presented in my From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism (2000). The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautiful Beauty and Revolutiorl in Science (1996), by explaining and justifying them. First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empirical progress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard than empirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the 'aesthetic canon', may well be based on 'aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successful theories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aesthetic criteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, 'revolutionary' scientists|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Cain S. Todd (2008). Unmasking the Truth Beneath the Beauty: Why the Supposed Aesthetic Judgements Made in Science May Not Be Aesthetic at All. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):61 – 79.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (2005). Truth Approximation by Empirical and Aesthetic Criteria: Reply to David Miller. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):356-360.
Nicholas Maxwell, Comprehensibility Rather Than Beauty. PhilSci Archive.
James W. McAllister (1991). The Simplicity of Theories: Its Degree and Form. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (1):1-14.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (2005). The Threefold Evaluation of Theories: A Synopsis of From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism. On Some Relations Between Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation (2000). Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):23-85.
Paul Thagard (2005). Why is Beauty a Road to the Truth? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):365-370.
David Davies (1998). McAllister's Aesthetics in Science: A Critical Notice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):25 – 32.
James W. Mcallister (1989). Truth and Beauty in Scientific Reason. Synthese 78 (1):25 - 51.
David Miller (2005). Beauty, a Road to the Truth? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):341-355.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (2002). Beauty, a Road to the Truth. Synthese 131 (3):291-328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,306 of 739,358 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #6,095 of 739,358 )
How can I increase my downloads?