David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann, Margaret Little, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth M. Armstrong & Lisa Harris
Bioethics 23 (1):1-8 (2009)
Over the last several years, as cesarean deliveries have grown increasingly common, there has been a great deal of public and professional interest in the phenomenon of women 'choosing' to deliver by cesarean section in the absence of any specific medical indication. The issue has sparked intense conversation, as it raises questions about the nature of autonomy in birth. Whereas mainstream bioethical discourse is used to associating autonomy with having a large array of choices, this conception of autonomy does not seem adequate to capture concerns and intuitions that have a strong grip outside this discourse. An empirical and conceptual exploration of how delivery decisions ought to be negotiated must be guided by a rich understanding of women's agency and its placement within a complicated set of cultural meanings and pressures surrounding birth. It is too early to be 'for' or 'against' women's access to cesarean delivery in the absence of traditional medical indications – and indeed, a simple pro- or con- position is never going to do justice to the subtlety of the issue. The right question is not whether women ought to be allowed to choose their delivery approach but, rather, taking the value of women's autonomy in decision-making around birth as a given, what sorts of guidelines, practices, and social conditions will best promote and protect women's full inclusion in a safe and positive birth process.
|Keywords||birth cesarean section cesarean delivery on maternal request CDMR vaginal delivery autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
D. Micah Hester (2013). Mary Mahowald: Bioethicist. The Pluralist 8 (3):122-132.
Similar books and articles
Sylvia Burrow (2008). Gendered Politeness, Self-Respect, and Autonomy. In Bernard Mulo Farenkia (ed.), In De la Politesse Linguistique au Cameroun / Linguistic Politeness in Cameroon. Peter Lang
Marilyn Friedman (2003). Autonomy, Gender, Politics. Oxford University Press.
Paul Thompson (1987). Home Birth: Consumer Choice and Restriction of Physician Autonomy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):481 - 487.
Marilyn Friedman (1996). Women's Autonomy and Feminist Aspirations. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:331-340.
Not By Me (1987). Home Birth: Consumer Choice and Restriction of Physician Autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6).
Sylvia Burrow (2012). Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Technology. Techne 16 (1):31-45.
Sylvia Burrow (2012). On The Cutting Edge: Ethical Responsiveness to Cesarean Section Rates. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):44-52.
Lauren A. Plante (2009). Mommy, What Did You Do in the Industrial Revolution? Meditations on the Rising Cesarean Rate. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):140 - 147.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #147,465 of 1,790,293 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,293 )
How can I increase my downloads?