Hastings Center Report 37 (5):27-35 (2007)
|Abstract||: The way patients make health care decisions is much more complicated than is often recognized. Patient autonomy allows both that patients will sometimes defer to clinicians and that they should sometimes be active inquirers, ready to question their clinicians and do some independent research. At the same time, patients' active inquiry requires clinicians' support|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Erich H. Loewy (1988). Oh Death, Where is Thy Sting? Reflections on Dealing with Dying Patients. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 9 (2):135-142.
Robert M. Veatch (1997). Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):391-401.
Rosemarie Tong (1997). The Promises and Perils of Pragmatism: Commentary on Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):147-152.
Terry E. Hill (2010). How Clinicians Make (or Avoid) Moral Judgments of Patients: Implications of the Evidence for Relationships and Research. [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5 (1):11.
David T. Ozar (1984). Patients' Autonomy: Three Models of the Professional-Lay Relationship in Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Michael J. Meyer (1992). Patients' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Stephen Wear (1983). Patient Autonomy, Paternalism, and the Conscientious Physician. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Eugene J. Stein (1980). Doctors and Patients: Partners or Adversaries? [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):118-122.
Rebecca Kukla (2005). Conscientious Autonomy: Displacing Decisions in Health Care. Hastings Center Report 35 (2):34-44.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,159 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?