Impulse Processing: A Dynamical Systems Model of Incremental Eye Movements in the Visual World Paradigm
Cognitive Science 35 (6):1009-1051 (2011)
|Abstract||The Visual World Paradigm (VWP) presents listeners with a challenging problem: They must integrate two disparate signals, the spoken language and the visual context, in support of action (e.g., complex movements of the eyes across a scene). We present Impulse Processing, a dynamical systems approach to incremental eye movements in the visual world that suggests a framework for integrating language, vision, and action generally. Our approach assumes that impulses driven by the language and the visual context impinge minutely on a dynamical landscape of attractors corresponding to the potential eye-movement behaviors of the system. We test three unique predictions of our approach in an empirical study in the VWP, and describe an implementation in an artificial neural network. We discuss the Impulse Processing framework in relation to other models of the VWP|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Ingle (2002). Problems with a “Cortical Screen” for Visual Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):195-196.
Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek (2003). The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
Michael Land & Benjamin Tatler (2009). Looking and Acting: Vision and Eye Movements in Natural Behaviour. OUP Oxford.
Lynn Huestegge, Jonathan Grainger & Ralph Radach (2003). Visual Word Recognition and Oculomotor Control in Reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):487-488.
Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle (2003). Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.
Colin G. Ellard (2001). Evolutionary and Intellectual Antecedents of Primate Visual Processing Streams. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):104-105.
Gary E. Raney (2003). E-Z Reader 7 Provides a Platform for Explaining How Low- and High-Level Linguistic Processes Influence Eye Movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):498-499.
Jillian H. Fecteau, Romeo Chua, Ian Franks & James T. Enns (2001). Visual Awareness and the on-Line Modification of Action. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (2):104-110.
Arthur B. Markman (2001). Are Dynamical Systems the Answer? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):50-51.
Bruce Bridgeman, David Hendry & L. Stark (1975). Failure to Detect Displacements of the Visual World During Saccadic Eye Movements. Vision Research 15:719-22.
Eyal M. Reingold (2003). Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Models and Predictions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):500-501.
Peter De Bolla (2003). The Education of the Eye: Painting, Landscape, and Architecture in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Stanford University Press.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2001). Visual Perception is Not Visual Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):985-985.
J. Kevin O'Regan & Alva Noë (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-25
Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?