Bradley's anti-relational argument

Philosophical Quarterly 7 (27):97-108 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2216956

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The anti-zombie argument.Keith Frankish - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):650–666.
Bradley's anti-relational argument: A reply to mr. Kulkarni.C. A. Campbell - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (30):54-62.
A Platonist’s Copernican Revolution.Darryl Wright - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:1-28.
Are there irreducibly relational facts.Josh Parsons - 2009 - In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-Making. Acumen Publishing. pp. 217-226.
Relations and Truthmaking.Fraser MacBride - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):161-179.
Color properties and color ascriptions: A relationalist manifesto.Jonathan Cohen - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):451-506.
Bradley and Schopenhauer, and the Epicurean Argument Concerning Death.Mikel Burley - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1-2):42-54.
Why the no‐miracles argument fails.Carl Matheson - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):263 – 279.
Bradley's regress, Russell's states of affairs, and some general remarks on the problem.Holger Leerhoff - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
Bradley’s Paradox and Russell’s Theory of Relations.Richard Parker - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:261-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references