Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This book presents and argues for a suitably articulated version of consensualism as a form of Kantian moral theory with an ability to powerfully illuminate the moral intuitions to which Kantian and utilitarian theories have traditionally appealed.|
|Keywords||Ethics Consensus (Social sciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$120.51 new (17% off) $120.73 used (17% off) $120.78 direct from Amazon (17% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1012.K77 2001|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elijah Millgram (2005). Ethics Done Right: Practical Reasoning as a Foundation for Moral Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Bruce Jennings (1991). Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Cordelia Fine (2006). Is the Emotional Dog Wagging its Rational Tail, or Chasing It? Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):83 – 98.
Joseph M. Paxton & Joshua D. Greene (2010). Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):511-527.
Conrad D. Johnson (1991). Moral Legislation: A Legal-Political Model for Indirect Consequentialist Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Campbell Brown (2011). Consequentialize This. Ethics 121 (4):749-771.
Jonathan D. Moreno (1988). Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Elvio Baccarini (2009). Moral Epistemological Coherentism, Contextualism, and Consensualism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):69-89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,056 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,288 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?