Review: Melnick, Kant's theory of self [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):535-536 (2010)
Melnick interprets the Kantian self from the first-person perspective as real abiding intellectual action. It unfolds in time but does not arise in inner or outer attending. Hence, it is neither a noumenal entity nor Kantian intuitable substance. Melnick thinks that his interpretation not only clarifies Kant’s arguments in the Paralogisms of the first Critique, but also illuminates Kant’s positive theory of self.Melnick argues that a thought is inchoate, unformed, and unsettled until the thinking self as intellectual marshaling action brings it into focus and “coalesces” around it a series of related but out-of-focus thoughts ready to replace the focal thought if necessary. This marshaling action is temporal because it shifts/adjusts progressive attending but cannot be intuited in time. Its shifting/adjusting constitutes its only reality, for it would have to be in objective time if it were intrinsically real, which Kant’s transcendental idealism does not allow.As intellectual marshaling action, the thinking self cannot know itself as simple substantial entity. Instead, it knows itself as always-subject-and-never-predicate because it is constant and never swallowed up by particular thoughts, and as indivisible because its self-awareness as marshaling action in a whole thought is not the sum of its
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thom Brooks (2003). Kant's Theory of Punishment. Utilitas 15 (02):206-.
Merle J.-C. (2000). A Kantian Critique of Kant's Theory of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311-338.
Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant's Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Chignell (2007). Review of Georges Dicker, Kant's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (2):307-309.
Owen Ware (2012). Review of Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
William Henry Werkmeister (1974). Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist, And: Kant's Principle of Personality, And: Kant Et le Problème du Mal, And: The Notion of Form in Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, And: Immanuel Kant: Briefwechsel (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):405-410.
Kristina Engelhard & Peter Mittelstaedt (2008). Kant's Theory of Arithmetic: A Constructive Approach? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):245 - 271.
Jean-Christophe Merle (2000). A Kantian Critique of Kant's Theory of Punishment. Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311 - 338.
Lara Denis (2006). Kant's Conception of Virtue. In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Lara Denis (2010). Review: McCarty, Kant's Theory of Action. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):533-535.
Günter Zöller (1992). Kant's Transcendental Psychology, And: Kant's Theory of Self-Consciousness (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (4):619-621.
Daniel Sutherland (2005). Kant on Fundamental Geometrical Relations. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):117-158.
Paul Guyer (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Orend (2004). Kant's Ethics of War and Peace. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Added to index2010-10-12
Total downloads34 ( #73,330 of 1,696,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #115,608 of 1,696,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?