Graduate studies at Western
Axiomathes 11 (1-3):21-35 (2000)
|Abstract||In this paper we shall show that structuralist constraints applied to moral idealizations, have applications in critical ethical argumentation. Moreover, we developed some systematic concepts which may be used to evaluate the relevance and adequacy of descriptions of moral problems relative to given idealizing moral perspectives. Finally, it is shown that any two moral perspectives are comparable via the Kemeny-Snell measure of distance of rankings.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Audi (1998). The Axiology of Moral Experience. Journal of Ethics 2 (4):355-375.
Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen (2009). See No Evil: Moral Sensitivity in the Formulation of Business Problems. Business Ethics 18 (4):335-348.
Torbjörn Tännsjö (2011). Applied Ethics. A Defence. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):397-406.
Howard R. Woodhouse (1985). Moral and Religious Education for Nigeria. Journal of Moral Education 14 (2):120-131.
Jonathan Friday * (2004). Education in Moral Theory and the Improvement of Moral Thought. Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):23-33.
T. Mooney, John Williams & Mark Nowacki (2011). Kovesi and the Formal and Material Elements of Concepts. Philosophia 39 (4):699-720.
John A. Codd (1977). Some Conceptual Problems in the Cognitive‐Developmental Approach to Morality. Journal of Moral Education 6 (3):147-157.
Robert Baker & Laurence B. McCullough (2007). The Relationship Between Moral Philosophy and Medical Ethics Reconsidered. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):271-276.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,324 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?