David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 77 (4):485-502 (2002)
Here are two widespread responses to Kant's categorical imperative. On one hand, one might note the absence of detailed rational derivation. On the other hand, even someone who maintains some skepticism is likely to have a sense that (nevertheless) there is something to Kant's central ideas. The recommended solution is analysis of elements of the categorical imperative. Their appeal turns out to have different sources. One aspect of the first formulation rests on the logic of normative utterances. But others can be justified only in terms of their contributions to desirable functionings of a moral order.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
H. J. Paton (1946/1967). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Hutchinson's University Library.
Philip J. Kain (2007). Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):105-116.
R. K. Gupta (1997). Notes on Kant's Derivation of the Various Formulae of the Categorical Imperative. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):383 – 396.
Gerhard Seel (2009). How Does Kant Justify the Universal Objective Validity of the Law of Right? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):71 – 94.
Oliver Sensen (2011). Kant's Conception of Inner Value. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
Marcus Arvan (2012). Unifying the Categorical Imperative. Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225.
Douglas Lind (1994). Kant on Criminal Punishment. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:61-74.
T. C. Williams (1968). The Concept of the Categorical Imperative: A Study of the Place of the Categorical Imperative in Kant's Ethical Theory. Oxford, Clarendon P..
Wolfgang Schwarz (1969). Book Review:The Concept of the Categorical Imperative: A Study of the Place of the Categorical Imperative in Kant's Ethical Theory. T. C. Williams. [REVIEW] Ethics 80 (1):82-.
Samuel J. Kerstein (2002). Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #23,262 of 1,139,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #64,318 of 1,139,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?