Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):17-25 (1993)
|Abstract||This paper clarifies the nature of genetic screening and morally evaluates using it to deny people employment. Four sets of variables determine screening’s ability to forecast disorder. The first two concern epistemological limitations: whether the gene itself has been located; whether knowledge of other family members is necessary. The latter two refer to genetic causality: whether other genes are needed; whether the gene causes the disorder or just a susceptibility to it.Considerations of privacy and justice warrant restricting screening to job-specific disorders, without prejudice to the worker. Screening is more of an invasion of privacy than most “searches” because our very selves are disclosed; serious stigmatizing can result. It is unjust to penalize someone for a susceptibility to a disorder. It is also unjust to use the genetic knowledge and technology, developed with public monies allocated for public good, against members of the public|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert H. Blank (1982). Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Alan Strudler (1994). The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing (1998). Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
Jose Sanmart�N. (1995). The New World of Human Genetic Technologies: The Policy Environment and Impacts of Genetic Screening Tests. [REVIEW] AI and Society 9 (1):105-114.
William D. Murry, James C. Wimbush & Dan R. Dalton (2001). Genetic Screening in the Workplace: Legislative and Ethical Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):365 - 378.
Lainie Friedman Ross (2002). Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Sahin Aksoy (2001). Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Diane B. Paul (1994). Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
D. Miller (1996). Parliament and Screening: Ethical and Social Problems Arising From Testing and Screening for HIV and Genetic Disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):366-366.
Ayodele S. Jegede (2009). Culture and Genetic Screening in Africa. Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):128-137.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta (2007). Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
James Tabery (2009). From a Genetic Predisposition to an Interactive Predisposition: Rethinking the Ethical Implications of Screening for Gene-Environment Interactions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (1):27-48.
Robert I. Field (1983). Biological Monitoring and Genetic Screening in the Industrial Workplace: A Synopsis and Analysis. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 11 (3):125-129.
Pierre Mallia & Henk ten Have (2003). From What Should We Protect Future Generations: Germ-Line Therapy or Genetic Screening? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):17-24.
Susan Lindee & Rebecca Mueller (2011). Is Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Medicine's Canary? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (3):316-331.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #154,629 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?