Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):119-135 (2013)
|Abstract||This paper explores citizens’ views about the welfare of farmed fish and the mental abilities of fish with a large survey data sample from Finland (n = 1,890). Although studies on attitudes towards animal welfare have been increasing, fish welfare has received only limited empirical attention, despite the rapid expansion of aquaculture sector. The results show that the welfare of farmed fish is not any great concern in the Finnish society. The analysis confirms the distinct character given to farmed fish compared to traditional farmed animals. Salmon are rated low in their mental abilities, including the capacity to feel pain, which may weaken ethical concerns for fish welfare. When analyzing the social determinants surrounding the rating of the welfare of farmed fish, it was shown that fish welfare attitudes follow general animal welfare attitudes regarding age and place of residence as fish welfare tends to be rated more negatively among younger age groups and among urban residents. However, no clear connection could be identified between gender and the rating of fish welfare, which may suggest that the distinct cultural categorization of fish diminishes the typical gender difference identified in animal attitudes. It is concluded that in order to improve awareness about fish welfare, there is a need to increase dissemination of scientific knowledge about fish and their welfare. Moreover, further research should be directed toward studying the moral positioning of fish and the distinct moral categorization they receive|
|Keywords||Animal attitudes Fish welfare Mental abilities of fish Farmed fish Conceptions of animals|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Karianne Kalshoven & Franck L. B. Meijboom (forthcoming). Sustainability at the Crossroads of Fish Consumption and Production Ethical Dilemmas of Fish Buyers at Retail Organizations in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Bernice Bovenkerk & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2013). Fish Welfare in Aquaculture: Explicating the Chain of Interactions Between Science and Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):41-61.
Jenny Bergqvist & Stefan Gunnarsson (2013). Finfish Aquaculture: Animal Welfare, the Environment, and Ethical Implications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):75-99.
L. J. Frewer, A. Kole, S. M. A. Van de Kroon & C. de Lauwere (2005). Consumer Attitudes Towards the Development of Animal-Friendly Husbandry Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4).
Frederike Kaldewaij (2013). Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.
F. L. B. Meijboom & B. Bovenkerk (2013). Fish Welfare: Challenge for Science and Ethics—Why Fish Makes the Difference. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):1-6.
Victoria A. Braithwaite, Felicity Huntingford & Ruud den Bos (2013). Variation in Emotion and Cognition Among Fishes. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):7-23.
Temple Grandin (2010). The Importance of Measurement to Improve the Welfare of Livestock, Poultry and Fish. In Temple Grandin (ed.), Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Cab International.
Sena S. De Silva & Giovanni M. Turchini (2008). Towards Understanding the Impacts of the Pet Food Industry on World Fish and Seafood Supplies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (5).
Temple Grandin (2010). Improving Livestock, Poultry, and Fish Welfare in Slaughter Plants with Auditing Programs. In Temple Grandin (ed.), Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Cab International.
Bernice Bovenkerk & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2012). The Moral Status of Fish. The Importance and Limitations of a Fundamental Discussion for Practical Ethical Questions in Fish Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):843-860.
Frøydis Gillund & Anne Ingeborg Myhr (forthcoming). Perspectives on Salmon Feed: A Deliberative Assessment of Several Alternative Feed Resources. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan (2009). Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5).
Paul R. Noble (1994). Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part I. Religious Studies 30 (4):419 - 436.
Added to index2011-12-21
Total downloads14 ( #83,151 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?