Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):990-991 (2001)
|Abstract||The sensorimotor theory of vision successfully blends in with the currently developing action-oriented account of cognition. As a theory of phenomenal consciousness, however, it suffers from the same shortcomings as the theories O'Regan & Noë (O&N) criticize. This is mainly due to the failure to avoid the explanatory gap by rejecting one notion of qualia while retaining the concept of experience with qualitative features in general.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Naomi M. Eilan (2006). On the Role of Perceptual Consciousness in Explaining the Goals and Mechanisms of Vision: A Convergence on Attention? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):67-88.
Nivedita Gangopadhyay, Michael Madary & Finn Spicer (eds.) (2010). Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems. Oxford University Press, Usa.
David Woodruff Smith (1992). Consciousness in Action. Synthese 90 (1):119-43.
Martin Kurthen (1999). The Gap Into Dissolution: The Real Story. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):157-158.
Keith Hossack (2003). Consciousness in Act and Action. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):187-203.
Nini Praetorius (2007). The Problems of Consciousness and Content in Theories of Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3).
Ned Block (1995). On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18:227-–247.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,731 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?