David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):229-243 (1991)
Summary For Imre Lakatos hismethodology of scientific research programmes was not only a philosophical theory of science and scientific change but also the conceptual foundation of empirical and historical studies of science. At least terminologically this view is today widely accepted: The concept of aresearch programme is used in all sorts of literature on science. In the present paper I argue that this concept can lead to serious distortions of empirical and historical studies of science if it is not detached from the Lakatosian philosophical framework. Themethodology of scientific research programmes has three main pitfalls, which may lead to disorientations of empirical and historical studies of science: (1) Contrary to what the term research programme may suggest, it offers no perspective on scientific research as an object of analysissui generis; (2) its concept of science is too narrow and covers only minor parts of what counts as science in the real world; (3) it reduces history of science to a mere sequence of research programmes and thereby eliminates the fact that there is an evolution of the structure of research programmes, too
|Keywords||Forschung Forschungsprogramm kritischer Rationalismus Imre Lakatos Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme Technisierung der Wissenschaft Wissenschaftsforschung|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2002). Verisimilitude and the Dynamics of Scientific Research Programmes. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2):349-368.
E. Glas (2001). The 'Popperian Programme' and Mathematics - Part II: From Quasi-Empiricism to Mathematical Research Programmes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):355-376.
Neil Thomason (1992). Could Lakatos, Even with Zahar's Criterion for Novel Fact, Evaluate the Copernican Research Programme? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):161-200.
Imre Lakatos (1978). Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press.
Franccsca di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Hans Radder (1982). An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos' Account of the 'Degenerating Phase' of Bohr's Atomic Theory. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 13 (1):99-109.
Juan Manuel Torres (1996). Competing Research Programmes on the Origin of Life. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 27 (2):325-346.
Jutta Schickore (1999). Sehen, Sichtbarkeit Und Empirische Forschung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (2):273-287.
Kurt Bayertz (1991). Forschungsprogramm Und Wissenschaftsentwicklung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):229 - 243.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads4 ( #264,689 of 1,100,108 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,012 of 1,100,108 )
How can I increase my downloads?