David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):275-286 (2001)
How is experience possible if the one who experiences is ‘forgotten’ and transcended? In his book Meister Eckhart: Mystic and Philosopher Reiner Schürmann explores two lines of thought in Eckhart’s philosophy of mind—Aristotelian and Neo-Platonic. The first of these, he observes, leads to the idea that being is revealed in the “birth of the Son”—that is, in God acting in place of the active intellect. The second leads to the idea that being is revealed in an unrepresentable Unity. These two lines of thought are, on their face, inconsistent. While the idea of the “birth of the Son” permits a division between ‘illuminator’ (universal) and ‘illuminated’ (particular), and so preserves the possibility of experience, the idea of an unrepresentable Unity does not. The resulting aporia, Schürmann argues, is resolved through Eckhart’s concept of detachment. But if, as Eckhart suggests, detachment is fundamentally atemporal, then it is not clear how, when one ‘lives in detachment,’ the process of becoming, through which an object appears to a subject, can be sustained. Hence, Schürmann’s resolution is problematic. In his Defense to charges of heresy, however, Eckhart takes positive steps towards explaining how something can simultaneously be a Unity and a multiplicity. In so doing, he offers us a window into both the nature of detachment and the nature of mind.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hubert Benz (2011). Neque quidquam intelligi potest esse sine esse. On the necessity of being as an epistemological principle in Meister Eckhart and Nicholas of Kues. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):142-170.
Ghasem Kakaie (2007). The Extroversive Unity of Existence From Ibn 'Arabi's and Meister Eckhart's Viewpoints. Topoi 26 (2):177-189.
Donald A. Cress (1979). Meister Eckhart, Mystic and Philosopher. Translation with Commentary by Reiner Schürmann. Modern Schoolman 57 (1):91-92.
Reiner Schürmann (1973). Heidegger and Meister Eckhart on Releasement. Research in Phenomenology 3 (1):95-119.
Robert Dobie (2002). Meister Eckhart's Metaphysics of Detachment. Modern Schoolman 80 (1):35-54.
John C. Carney, PhD., On Reiner Schurmann's Account of Perigrinal Ontology in the Philosophy of Meister Eckhart.
Robert E. Carter (2009). God and Nothingness. Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 1-21.
Author unknown, Meister Eckhart. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John J. Murphy (1996). MEISTER ECKHART AND THE VIA NEGATIVA: EPISTEMOLOGY AND MYSTICAL LANGUAGE. New Blackfriars 77 (906).
Julie Casteigt (2011). 'La science de l'âme est plus certaine que toute autre science'. Une interprétation eckhartienne du témoignage (Jn 8, 17). [REVIEW] Chôra 9:295-320.
Frank Tobin (1980). Recent Work in English on Meister Eckhart. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):207-219.
Anton C. Pegis (1940). The Establishment of the University of Being in the Doctrine of Meister Eckhart of Hochheim. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):544-545.
D. C. J. (1979). Meister Eckhart. Review of Metaphysics 32 (4):769-770.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads27 ( #143,581 of 1,796,302 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #60,157 of 1,796,302 )
How can I increase my downloads?