David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Brain and Mind 4 (3):341-351 (2003)
The canonical Buddhist account of the cognitive processes underlying our experience of the world prefigures recent developments in neuroscience. The developments in question are centered on two main trends in neuroscience research and thinking. The first of these involves the idea that our everyday experience of ourselves and of the world consists in a series of discrete microstates. The second closely related notion is that affective structures and systems play critical roles in governing the formation of such states. Both of these ideas are contained within the Buddhist theory of dependent co-origination. This paper explicates the theory of dependent co-origination in light of the aforementioned developments. It examines the role of the theory of dependent co-origination within Buddhism and it draws attention to critical differences with the neuroscientific account of the same process. Finally, it discusses specific ways in which these differences may be usefully applied to neuroscience research and thinking.
|Keywords||appetite Buddhism contingent dependent desire emergence emotion interdependence Kant neuroscience perception self Spinoza|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jaakko Hintikka & John Symons (2003). Systems of Visual Identification in Neuroscience: Lessons From Epistemic Logic. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):89-104.
Eviatar Shulman (2008). Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (2):297-317.
Joanna Rogers Macy (1979). Dependent Co-Arising: The Distinctiveness of Buddhist Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 7 (1):38 - 52.
Charles Muller, Innate Enlightenment and No-Thought: A Response to the Critical Buddhist Position on Zen.
Adam Scarfe (2006). Hegelian 'Absolute Idealism' with Yogācāra Buddhism on Consciousness, Concept ( Begriff ), and Co-Dependent Origination ( Pratītyasamutpāda ). Contemporary Buddhism 7 (1):47-73.
Alex Wayman (1980). Dependent Origination-the Indo-Tibetan Tradition. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (4):275-300.
Matthew MacKenzie (2010). Enacting the Self: Buddhist and Enactivist Approaches to the Emergence of the Self. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):75-99.
Derek K. Heyman (1997). Dual and Non-Dual Ontology in Satre and MahÄyÄNa Buddhism. Man and World 30 (4):431-443.
Jennifer Mcmahon Railey (1997). Dependent Origination and the Dual-Nature of the Japanese Aesthetic. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):123 – 132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #16,893 of 1,099,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,751 of 1,099,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?