David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 24 (01):41-62 (2012)
This article argues that the decision problem in the original position should be characterized as a decision problem under uncertainty even when it is assumed that the denizens of the original position know that they have an equal chance of ending up in any given individual’s place. It supports this claim by arguing that (a) the continuity axiom of decision theory does not hold between all of the outcomes the denizens of the original position face and that (b) neither us nor the denizens of the original position can know the exact point at which discontinuity sets in, because the language we employ in comparing different outcomes is ineradicably vague. It is also argued that the account underlying (b) can help proponents of superiority in value theory defend their view against arguments offered by Norcross and Griffin.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Derek Parfit (2011). On What Matters. Oxford University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Moehler (2015). The Rawls–Harsanyi Dispute: A Moral Point of View. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1).
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Robinson (2009). A Defense of the Maximin Principle in Rawls' Theory of Justice. Humanity and Social Science Journal 4 (2):175-179.
Speranta Dumitru (2007). Equal Minds Behind the Veil of Ignorance. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:127-135.
Samir Okasha (2012). Social Justice, Genomic Justice and the Veil of Ignorance: Harsanyi Meets Mendel. Economics and Philosophy 28 (1):43-71.
Russell Disilvestro (2005). Human Embryos in the Original Position? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):285 – 304.
Francis Cheneval, Toward a Normative Theory of Multilateral Democracy: The Original Position and the Principles.
Carlos Soto (2012). The Veil of Ignorance and Health Resource Allocation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):387-404.
János Kis (2002). Behind the Veil of Ignorance. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):131-159.
Sven Ove Hansson (1996). Decision Making Under Great Uncertainty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):369-386.
Paul Busch & Pekka J. Lahti (1985). A Note on Quantum Theory, Complementarity, and Uncertainty. Philosophy of Science 52 (1):64-77.
Chris Roberts (2012). Public Relations and Rawls: An Ill-Fitting Veil to Wear. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (3):163-176.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Uncertainty and the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167.
F. Ben Abdelaziz, P. Lang & R. Nadeau (1999). Dominance and Efficiency in Multicriteria Decision Under Uncertainty. Theory and Decision 47 (3):191-211.
Alexei M. Marcoux (1999). Freeman and Evan. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):207-224.
Julia Tanner (2011). Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Added to index2012-02-18
Total downloads63 ( #67,174 of 1,796,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #34,969 of 1,796,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?