Dewey's critique of art for art's sake
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):93-98 (1968)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCésar Graña (1962). John Dewey's Social Art and the Sociology of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (4):405-412.
Meter Amevans (1975). Art for Art's Sake Again? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):303-307.
Van Meter Ames (1975). Art for Art's Sake Again? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):303 - 307.
Richard Shusterman (1984). Aesthetic Censorship: Censoring Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (2):171-180.
Casey Haskins (1990). Kant, Autonomy, and Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (3):235-237.
Scott R. Stroud (2007). Dewey on Art as Evocative Communication. Education and Culture 23 (2):pp. 6-26.
Anne Mary Tamme (1956). A Critique of John Dewey's Theory of Fine Art in the Light of the Principles of Thomism. Washington, Catholic University of America Press.
Spencer K. Wertz (2007). The National Endowment for the Arts and its Opposition: Danto's Argument for Art for Our Sake. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,300 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
