Traditional art history's complaint against the linguistic analysis of visual art

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (4):345-349 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/431324

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interpreting visual culture: explorations in the hermeneutics of the visual.Ian Heywood & Barry Sandywell (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
Art as the evolution of visual knowledge.Charles Joseph Biederman - 1948 - Red Wing, Minn.: Red Wing, Minn..
The making and meaning of art.Laurie Adams - 2006 - Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Conceptual Art Is Not What It Seems.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2007 - In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and conceptual art. New York: Oxford University Press.
Art and its History.Risto Pitkänen - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
On knowing: art and visual culture.Paul Duncum & Ted Bracey (eds.) - 2001 - Christchurch, N.Z.: Canterbury University Press.
On the traditional doctrine of art.Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy - 1977 - Ipswich: Golgonooza Press.
Essay on the Philosophy and History of Art.Johann Joachim Winckelmann - 2005 - Continuum. Edited by Curtis Bowman & Johann Joachim Winckelmann.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
204 (#94,896)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Postscript on Modernism and Postmodernism, Both.Joseph Margolis - 1989 - Theory, Culture and Society 6 (1):5-30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references