The only objective evidence for consciousness
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Mind and Behavior 27 (1):43-56 (2006)
We describe what seems to be the only objective evidence for the existence of consciousness as an entity beyond its neural correlates. We display this evidence, the nature of observation in quantum mechanics, with a theory-neutral version of the archetypal demonstration of quantum phenomena, the two-slit experiment. This undisputed empirical result provides objective evidence for consciousness, the straightforward alternative being the assumption of not only a completely deterministic world, but a conspiratorial one as well. The objection to this evidence for consciousness, that a not-conscious robot could be the observer, is examined
|Keywords||*Consciousness States *Empirical Methods Archetypes Neurons Physics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bill Faw (2004). Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness: A Review Article. [REVIEW] Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (2):69-72.
Imants Barušs (2003). Introduction. In Imants Baruss (ed.), Alterations of Consciousness: An Empirical Analysis for Social Scientists. American Psychological Association. 3-23.
Dick Bierman (2001). On the Nature of Anamalous Phenomena: Another Reality Between the World of Subjective Consciousness and the Objective World of Physics? In P. Loockvane (ed.), The Physical Nature of Consciousness. John Benjamins. 29--269.
P. Marcer & E. Mitchell (2001). What is Consciousness? An Essay on the Relativistic Quantum Holographic Model of the Brain/Mind, Working by Phase Conjugate Adaptive Resonance. In P. Loockvane (ed.), The Physical Nature of Consciousness. John Benjamins.
Stuart R. Hameroff (2001). Consciousness, the Brain, and Space-Time Geometry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:74-104.
Roger Penrose (2001). Consciousness, the Brain, and Spacetime Geometry: An Addendum: Some New Developments on the Orch OR Model for Consciousness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:105-10.
Philip Loockvane (2001). The Philosophy of Consciousness, 'Deep' Teleology and Objective Selection. In Philip Van Loocke (ed.), The Physical Nature of Consciousness. Advances in Consciousness Research, Vol 29. 293-311.
W. L. Miranker (2002). A Quantum State Model of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (3):3-14.
Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2007). An Empirical-Phenomenological Approach to Quantifying Consciousness and States of Consciousness: With Particular Reference to Understanding the Nature of Hypnosis. In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press. 167-194.
Larry R. Vandervert (2006). Kuttner and Rosenblum Failed to "Objectify" Consciousness. Journal of Mind and Behavior 27 (2):167-176.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?