``Disagreement and Reflective Ascent"
In Jennifer Lackey (ed.), New Essays on Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJonathan Kvanvig (2011). The Rational Significance of Reflective Ascent. In T. Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (2011). ``The Rational Significance of Reflective Ascent&Quot. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryan Frances (2010). The Reflective Epistemic Renegade. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):419-463.
Michelle Blohm (2011). The Feminine and Masculine as Principles of Ascent in the Itinerarium Mentis in Deum. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):25-42.
Axel Gelfert (2011). Who is an Epistemic Peer? Logos and Episteme 2 (4):507-514.
John K. Davis (Forthcoming). An Alternative to Relativism. Philosophical Topics (Special Issue on Moral Disagreement).
Dan Sperber (1997). Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs. Mind and Language 12 (1):67-83.
G. Norwood (1917). The Ascent of Olympus The Ascent of Olympus. By Rendel Harris. 8vo. Pp. 140. Ten Illustrations and Six of Coins. Published for the John Rylands Library by the University Press, Manchester, and by Longmans, Green and Co. 1917. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (5-6):139-140.
Jonathan Matheson (2009). Conciliatory Views of Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 6 (3):269-279.
Michael Veber (2004). Contextualism and Semantic Ascent. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):261-272.
Joshua C. Thurow (2012). Does Religious Disagreement Actually Aid the Case for Theism? In Jake Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford.
Brian Ribeiro (2011). Philosophy and Disagreement. CrÃtica 43:3-25.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-11-29Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
