Plantinga's proper function account of warrant
Graduate studies at Western
In J. J. Kvanvig (ed.), Warrant and Contemporary Epistemology. Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, Maryland (1996)
|Abstract||Plantinga thus offers an approach that begins by assessing the faculties or abilities of a cognitive system or agent. Once such an assessment is complete, the epistemologist is in a position to infer the epistemic status of the doxastic products of those faculties or abilities.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alvin Plantinga (1995). Review: Précis of Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):393 - 396.
Bernardo Cantens (2006). Cognitive Faculties and Evolutionary Naturalism. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:201-208.
Alvin Plantinga (1993). Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press.
N. M. L. Nathan (1997). Naturalism and Self-Defeat: Plantinga's Version. Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
Evan Fales (1996). Plantinga's Case Against Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):432-451.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1996). ``Plantinga's Proper Function Theory of Warrant&Quot. In , Warrant and Contemporary Epistemology. Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
T. M. Botham (2003). Plantinga and Favorable Mini-Environments. Synthese 135 (3):431 - 441.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Plantinga on Warrant. Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.
Daniel M. Johnson (2011). Proper Function and Defeating Experiences. Synthese 182 (3):433-447.
Alvin Plantinga (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?