``Religious Pluralism and the Buridans Ass Paradox"
Graduate studies at Western
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):1-26 (2009)
|Abstract||The paradox of ’Buridan’s ass’ involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass will eat from one rather than the other, because the alternative is to starve. But why does this eating happen? What reason is operative, and what explanation can be given as to why the ass eats from, say, the left bale rather than the right bale? Why doesn’t the ass remain caught between the options, forever indecisive and starving to death? Religious pluralists face a similar dilemma, a dilemma that I will argue is more difficult to address than the paradox just described|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joe Mintoff (2001). Buridan's Ass and Reducible Intentions. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:207-221.
Stephanie West (1981). The Golden Ass James Tatum: Apuleius and The Golden Ass. Pp. 199; 20 Illustrations. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1979. £7.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (01):46-48.
Adebowale Oriku (2008). Buridan's Ass: A Paradox Redux. Philosophy Now 65:53-54.
Ken Dowden (1980). Essays on the Golden Ass B.L. Hijmans Jr., R.T. Van der Paardt (Edd.): Aspects of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Pp. X + 276. Groningen: Bouma's Boekhuis, 1978. Fl. 70. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (01):33-34.
Guillermo Barron (2000). Buridan's Ass and Other Dilemmas. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (2/3):21-31.
Michael Hauskeller (2010). Why Buridan's Ass Doesn't Starve. Philosophy Now 81:9-9.
Nuccio Ordine (1996). Giordano Bruno and the Philosophy of the Ass. Yale University Press.
M. Heseltine (1918). Apuleius: The Golden Ass Apuleius: The Golden Ass. Being the Metamorphoses of Lucius Apuleius. With an English Translation by W. Adlington (1566). Revised by S. Gaselee, Fellow and Librarian of Magdalene College, Cambridge. Frontispiece, Portrait of Apuleius on a Coin. One Vol. Pp. Xxiv+608. London: William Heinemann; New York: The Macmillan Co., 1915. 5s. Net. Loeb Classical Library. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 32 (1-2):41-42.
Eleanor Winsor Leach (2009). Two Bundles of Hay (R.H.F.) Carver The Protean Ass. The Metamorphoses of Apuleius From Antiquity to the Renaissance. Pp. Xvi + 545. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Cased, £85. ISBN: 978-0-19-921786-1. (J.H.) Gaisser The Fortunes of Apuleius and the Golden Ass. A Study in Transmission and Reception. Pp. Xvi + 365, Ills, Colour Pls. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008. Cased, £27.95, US$47.50. ISBN: 978-0-691-13136-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (02):482-.
Alfred R. Mele (1991). Motivational Ties. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:431-442.
Roger A. Shiner (1973). The Non-Rationality of Buridan's Ass. Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):329-335.
Sharon M. Kaye (2005). Buridan\'s Ass: Is There Wisdom in the Story? Dialogue and Universalism 15 (3-4):137-146.
Jan Narveson (1976). Utilitarianism, Group Actions, and Coordination or, Must the Utilitarian Be a Buridan's Ass? Noûs 10 (2):173-194.
Michael Stoeltzner, An Auxiliary Motive for Buridan's Ass. Otto Neurath on Choice Without Preference in Science and Society.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-11-29
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?