Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 45 (3):153 - 158 (1985)
|Abstract||Suppose we want to know whether a person justifiably believes a certain claim. Further, suppose that our interest in this question is because we take such justification to be necessary for knowledge. To justifiably believe a claim requires more than there being a justification for that claim. Presumably, there is a justification for accepting all sorts of scientific theories of which I have no awareness; because of my lack of awareness, I do not justifiably believe those theories. Further, even if I, by chance, did believe one of those theories, I might not justifiably believe it; for I may be completely unaware of any justification for it. I then would not believe it..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James P. Sterba (1998). A Biocentrist Strikes Back. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):361-376.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1985). Swain on the Basing Relation. Analysis 45 (3):153-158.
Kevin McCain (2012). The Interventionist Account of Causation and the Basing Relation. Philosophical Studies 159 (3):357-382.
Michael Philips (1986). The Justification of Punishment and the Justification of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 5 (3):393 - 416.
Lory Lemke (1986). Kvanvig and Swain on the Basing Relation. Analysis 46 (3):138-144.
Marshall Swain (1985). Justification, Reasons, and Reliability. Synthese 64 (1):69 - 92.
John Turri (2010). On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Colin Cheyne (2009). A Paradox of Justified Believing. Ratio 22 (3):278-290.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig & Christopher Menzel (1990). The Basic Notion of Justification. Philosophical Studies 59 (3):235-261.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?