David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:333 - 347 (1990)
One of the serious motivations for the development of non-monotonic logics is the fact that, however sure we may be of some set of facts, there can come a time at which at least some of them must be given up. A number of philosophical approaches have stemmed from the study of scientific inference, in which a law or theory, accepted on good evidence at one time, comes to be rejected on the basis of more evidence. These approaches are reviewed, and an alternative approach, whose key idea is the control of observational error for the purpose of predictive adequacy is developed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Smeyers (2012). Chains of Dependency: On the Disenchantment and the Illusion of Being Free at Last (Part 2). Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (3):461-471.
David Enoch (2011). Reason-Giving and the Law. In Leslie Green & Brian Leiter (eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press
Henry E. Kyburg (ed.) (1984). Theory and Measurement. Cambridge University Press.
Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij (2010). A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.
Paul Smeyers (2012). Chains of Dependency: On the Disenchantment and the Illusion of Being Free at Last (Part 1). Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (2):177-191.
Joel M. Smith (1988). Scientific Reasoning or Damage Control: Alternative Proposals for Reasoning with Inconsistent Representations of the World. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:241 - 248.
Peter Murphy (ed.) (2003). Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Alex Stein (2005). Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
Henry E. Kyburg Jr (1985). The Confirmation of Quantitative Laws. Philosophy of Science 52 (1):1-22.
J. Ferreiros (2004). The Motives Behind Cantor’s Set Theory: Physical, Biological and Philosophical Questions. Science in Context 17 (1/2):1–35.
Henry E. Kyburg (1993). The Evidence of Your Own Eyes. Minds and Machines 3 (2):201-218.
Donald Gillies (2000). Varieties of Propensity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):807-835.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads2 ( #533,844 of 1,725,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?