David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 25 (3):343-367 (2012)
According to Joseph Raz's sources thesis, the existence and content of authoritative directives must be identifiable by resort to the social fact of their provenance from a de facto authority, without regard to any of the normative considerations that the authority in question is supposed to rely on in its judgment. This article argues that the sources thesis fails to account for the role of jurisdictional considerations (namely, considerations about the scope of a de facto authority's power) in the identification of valid law. It examines a legal system with a legislature and courts and a practice of constitutional review of legislation by the courts for its conformity with fundamental rights and argues that the special normative status of (at least some) authoritative directives in this legal system depends on respect for jurisdiction. An assessment of whether an authority has stayed intra vires involves recourse to the normative considerations that it is the authority's job to weigh up. This criticism of the sources thesis highlights the importance of incorporating jurisdiction into our philosophical accounts of legal authority
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Scott Hershovitz (2003). Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority. Legal Theory 9 (3):201-220.
Andrei Marmor (2005). Authority, Equality and Democracy. Ratio Juris 18 (3):315-345.
Joseph Raz (1994). Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (2004). Incorporation by Law. Legal Theory 10 (1):1-17.
Citations of this work BETA
Antony Hatzistavrou (2012). Motivation, Reconsideration and Exclusionary Reasons. Ratio Juris 25 (3):318-342.
Similar books and articles
Shaun McVeigh (ed.) (2006). Jurisprudence of Jurisdiction. Routledge-Cavendish.
Anthony Reeves (2010). The Moral Authority of International Law. APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law 10 (1):13-18.
Shlomit Wallerstein (2015). Delegation of Powers and Authority in International Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):123-140.
Stephen Darwall (2011). Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.
Peter Rijpkema (2011). The Inevitability of Moral Evaluation. Ratio Juris 24 (4):413-434.
Daniel Star & Candice Delmas (2011). Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence 2 (1):143-160.
Dudley Knowles (2007). The Domain of Authority. Philosophy 82 (1):23-43.
Adam Tucker (2012). The Limits of Razian Authority. Res Publica 18 (3):225-240.
M. Baurmann (2000). Legal Authority as a Social Fact. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):247-262.
Edward Mussawir (2011). Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. Routledge.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Bas van der Vossen (2011). Assessing Law's Claim to Authority. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (3):481-501.
Wim de Muijnck (2011). Normative Authority for Empirical Science. Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):263-275.
Added to index2012-08-04
Total downloads4 ( #288,602 of 1,409,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #176,758 of 1,409,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?