Perspectives on Science 12 (4) (2004)
|Abstract||: This article explores debate as a key scientific practice among the medical elite in nineteenth-century Paris, with an emphasis on academic debate and debate in the scientific/medical press. I use the debate over the microscope, which took place in the Paris Academy of Medicine in 1854-55 and concurrently in the medical press, to illustrate the role of debate as scientific practice. Focusing on the debate in the press, I show how medical journalists used the debate in the Academy to raise larger questions about the nature of science and medicine and to legitimate French microscopy. I suggest that debate was an important scientific practice in nineteenth-century Paris, not only owing to a longstanding belief that truth emerges through disputation but also depending on and exemplifying a shared masculine culture of honor|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Achinstein (1991). Particles and Waves: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Wieland (2006). Scientific Theory and Agricultural Practice: Plant Breeding in Germany From the Late 19th to the Early 20th Century. Journal of the History of Biology 39 (2):309 - 343.
Benjamin Naneix (2008). The Failure of the “Localisationist Project” in Mental Medicine in Nineteenth Century France and the Emergence of the Neurological Clinic. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):57-63.
Jean-Gaël Barbara (2009). Interplay Between Scientific Theories and Researches on the Diseases of the Nervous System in the Nineteenth-Century, Paris. Medicine Studies 1 (4):339-352.
Robert Nola & Howard Sankey (eds.) (2000). After Popper, Kuhn, and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Daniel Hicks (2011). Scientific Practices and Their Social Context. Dissertation, U. of Notre Dame
André Kukla (1994). Scientific Realism, Scientific Practice, and the Natural Ontological Attitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):955-975.
William Goodwin (forthcoming). Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Ann F. La Berge (2004). Debate as Scientific Practice in Nineteenth-Century Paris: The Controversy Over the Microscope. Perspectives on Science 12 (4):424-453.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #114,124 of 549,106 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,106 )
How can I increase my downloads?