David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Derrida Today 2 (2):186-199 (2009)
Derrida's purpose in ‘Death Penalties’ (2004), is to show how both arguments in favour of capital punishment, exemplified by Kant's, and arguments for its abolition, such as those of Beccaria, are deconstructible. He claims that ‘never, to my knowledge, has any philosopher as a philosopher, in his or her own strictly and systematically philosophical discourse, never has any philosophy as such contested the legitimacy of the death penalty.’ (2004, 146) Derrida also asks how it is possible ‘to abolish the death penalty in a way that is based on principle, that is universal and unconditional, and not because it has become not only cruel but useless, insufficiently exemplary?’ (2004, 137) In my paper, I examine Derrida's claim about the lack of systematic opposition to the death penalty on the part of philosophers and suggest an answer to his question concerning the possibility of a universal and unconditional opposition to capital punishment
|Keywords||970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies C1 220317 Poststructuralism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Bernasconi (2002). A Love That is Stronger Than Death: Sacrifice in the Thought of Levinas, Heidegger, and Bloch. Angelaki 7 (2):9 – 16.
John D. Caputo, Mark Dooley & Michael J. Scanlon (eds.) (2001). Questioning God. Indiana University Press.
Simone De Beauvoir (2004). An Eye for an Eye. In Margaret A. Simons, Marybeth Timmermann & Mary Beth Mader (eds.), Philosophical Writings. University of Illinois Press.
Jacques Derrida (1992). Force of Law: The 'Mystical Foundation of Authority'. In Ed. Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfield and David G. Carlson. In Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld & David Carlson (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. Routledge.
Jacques Derrida (2004). For What Tomorrow: A Dialogue. Stanford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zsuzsa Baross (2008). Lessons to Live (1): Posthumous Fragments, for Jacques Derrida. Derrida Today 1 (2):247-265.
William A. Edmundson (1984). Death Penalties: A Review of Raoul Berger, Death Penalties. [REVIEW] Duke Law Journal 1984:624-29.
Françoise Dastur (2006). Derrida and the Question of Presence. Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):45-62.
Adina Nicoleta Gavrilă (2011). Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished? Arguments for and Against the Centuries-Old Punishment. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):82-98.
Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland (2008). Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Nelson T. Potter (2002). Kant and Capital Punishment Today. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):267-282.
Jacques Derrida (1993). Aporias: Dying--Awaiting (One Another at) the "Limits of Truth" (Mourir--S'attendre aux "Limites De La Vérité"). Stanford University Press.
William A. Edmundson (2002). Afterword: Proportionality and the Difference Death Makes. Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):40-43.
Martin McQuillan (2009). Extra Time and the Death Penalties: On a Newly Arisen Violent Tone in Philosophy. Derrida Today 2 (2):133-150.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads43 ( #46,302 of 1,410,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,954 of 1,410,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?