Love, that indispensable supplement: Irigaray and Kant on love and respect
Hypatia 20 (3):92-114 (2005)
| Abstract | : Is love essential to ethical life, or merely a supplement? In Kant's view, respect and love, as duties, are in tension with each other because love involves drawing closer and respect involves drawing away. By contrast, Irigaray says that love and respect do not conflict because love as passion must also involve distancing and we have a responsibility to love. I argue that love, understood as passion and based on respect, is essential to ethics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSharon Krishek (2008). Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Melissa Seymour Fahmy (2010). Kantian Practical Love. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Robert Johnson (1998). Love in Vain. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (S1):45-50.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads41 ( #27,954 of 549,753 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
