Market Reactions to Increased Reliability of Sustainability Information

Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):111-128 (2012)
Abstract
This article investigates whether investors consider the reliability of companies’ sustainability information when determining the companies’ market value. Specifically, we examine market reactions (in terms of abnormal returns) to events that increase the reliability of companies’ sustainability information but do not provide markets with additional sustainability information. Controlling for competing effects, we regard companies’ additions to an internationally important sustainability index as such events and consider possible determinants for market reactions. Our results suggest that first, investors take into account the reliability of sustainability information when determining the market value of a company and second, the benefits of increased reliability of sustainability information vary cross-sectionally. More specifically, companies that carry higher risks for investors (e.g., higher systematic investment risk, higher financial leverage, and higher levels of opportunistic management behavior) react more strongly to an increase in the reliability of sustainability information. Finally, we show that the benefits of an increase in the reliability of sustainability information are higher in times of economic uncertainty (e.g., during economic downturns and generally high stock price volatilities)
Keywords Sustainability  Corporate social responsibility  Reliability  Market reactions  Event study
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Yves Fassin (2009). The Stakeholder Model Refined. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):113 - 135.
    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
    Joseph Tainter (2003). A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
    Elena Cavagnaro & George H. Curiel (2006). A Framework to Introduce Leadership for Sustainability in Higher Education. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:286-291.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-09-15

    Total downloads

    5 ( #178,805 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.