Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):111-128 (2012)
|Abstract||This article investigates whether investors consider the reliability of companies’ sustainability information when determining the companies’ market value. Specifically, we examine market reactions (in terms of abnormal returns) to events that increase the reliability of companies’ sustainability information but do not provide markets with additional sustainability information. Controlling for competing effects, we regard companies’ additions to an internationally important sustainability index as such events and consider possible determinants for market reactions. Our results suggest that first, investors take into account the reliability of sustainability information when determining the market value of a company and second, the benefits of increased reliability of sustainability information vary cross-sectionally. More specifically, companies that carry higher risks for investors (e.g., higher systematic investment risk, higher financial leverage, and higher levels of opportunistic management behavior) react more strongly to an increase in the reliability of sustainability information. Finally, we show that the benefits of an increase in the reliability of sustainability information are higher in times of economic uncertainty (e.g., during economic downturns and generally high stock price volatilities)|
|Keywords||Sustainability Corporate social responsibility Reliability Market reactions Event study|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit (2003). Reliability of Information on the Internet: Some Distinctions. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng (2011). Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):269-282.
Andrea Caldelli & Marisa Luisa Parmigiani (2004). Management Information System – a Tool for Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):159 - 171.
Isabel Costa Lourenço, Manuel Castelo Branco, José Dias Curto & Teresa Eugénio (2012). How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):417 - 428.
Michael Robinson, Anne Kleffner & Stephanie Bertels (2011). Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 101 (3):493-505.
Alan Willis (2003). The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):233 - 237.
Lizet Quaak, Theo Aalbers & John Goedee (2007). Transparency of Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Breweries. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3):293 - 308.
John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Costanza Consolandi, Ameeta Jaiswal-Dale, Elisa Poggiani & Alessandro Vercelli (2009). Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):185 - 197.
Frank C. Krysiak (2009). Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):483 - 492.
Joseph Tainter (2003). A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
Elena Cavagnaro & George H. Curiel (2006). A Framework to Introduce Leadership for Sustainability in Higher Education. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:286-291.
X. D. Xu, S. X. Zeng & C. M. Tam (2012). Stock Market's Reaction to Disclosure of Environmental Violations: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):227-237.
Robert Ayres, Jeroen van den Berrgh & John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and Consilience. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Added to index2011-09-15
Total downloads5 ( #170,177 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?