David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:379 - 387 (1994)
This paper is part of a larger project defending of the foundations of microeconomics against recent criticisms by philosophers. Here, we undermine one source of these criticisms, arising from philosophers' disappointment with the performance of microeconomic tools, in particular game theory, when these are applied to normative decision theory. Hollis and Sugden have recently articulated such disappointment in a sophisticated way, and have argued on the basis of it that the economic conception of rationality is inadequate. We argue, however, that their claim rests upon a misunderstanding of the concept of a game as it is used in microeconomics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Don Ross & Chantale LaCasse (1995). Towards a New Philosophy of Positive Economics. Dialogue 34 (03):467-.
Maurice Lagueux (1995). L'économique: Branche des Mathématiques Ou Branche de L'Histoire? Dialogue 34 (03):495-.
Similar books and articles
Kevin D. Hoover (2010). Idealizing Reduction: The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 73 (3):329 - 347.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Common Knowledge of Rationality in Extensive Games. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (3):261-280.
Alex Rosenberg (1992). Neo-Classical Economics and Evolutionary Theory: Strange Bedfellows? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:174 - 183.
Boudewijn De Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Steven T. Kuhn (2004). Reflections on Ethics and Game Theory. Synthese 141 (1):1 - 44.
Steven Rappaport (1986). The Modal View and Defending Microeconomics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:289 - 297.
Miguel Sicart (2009). The Banality of Simulated Evil: Designing Ethical Gameplay. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):191-202.
Wlodek Rabinowicz (1998). Grappling With the Centipede: Defence of Backward Induction for BI-Terminating Games. Economics and Philosophy 14 (01):95-.
Daniel Eggers (2011). Hobbes and Game Theory Revisited: Zero-Sum Games in the State of Nature. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):193-226.
Martin Bunzl (2002). Evolutionary Games Without Rationality? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.
Sigmund Loland (1999). Justice and Game Advantage in Sporting Games. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):159-178.
Wendy K. Mariner (1983). Market Theory and Moral Theory in Health Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (2).
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2003). Games as Formal Tools Versus Games as Explanations in Logic and Science. Foundations of Science 8 (4):317-364.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads6 ( #230,646 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?