The scientific study of lingustic behaviour: A perspective on the Skinner-Chomsky controversy
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 4 (1):17–51 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChuanfei Chin (2011). Models as Interpreters (with a Case Study From Pain Science). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):303-312.
Carl G. Hedman (1975). Toward a Spinozistic Modification of Skinner's Theory of Man. Inquiry 18 (3):325 – 335.
William Goodwin (forthcoming). Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Ullin T. Place (1988). Skinner's Distinction Between Rule-Governed and Contingency-Shaped Behaviour. Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):225 – 234.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Martin E. Morf (1998). Sartre, Skinner, and the Compatibilist Freedom to Be Authentically. Behavior and Philosophy 26 (1/2):29 - 43.
John Collins (2007). Meta-Scientific Eliminativism: A Reconsideration of Chomsky's Review of Skinner's "Verbal Behavior". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):625 - 658.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,359 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,359 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
