David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237 (2001)
The author argues that the distinctive aspects of political liberalism have historical roots in the republican tradition that is often described as “neo-roman,” and recently given articulation in the work of Q. Skinner and P. Pettit. The primary task of this paper will be to layout these correlations, to provide, as it were, a mapping between the vocabulary of the neo-roman theory and that of political liberalism. By tracing the genealogy of political liberalism, the author argues that we ought to rethink the history, the vocabulary, and conceptual framework of contemporary political philosophy. In particular, seeing political liberalism as a form of republican theory as well as a form of liberal theory changes how we understand it: it brings out certain distinctive features of the structure of the view that are often overlooked, such as its stress on certain civic duties and its conception of freedom as a freedom of the city. If leading republican and liberal thinkers turn out to have much in common, then we will have to rethink also our intellectual geography: we will have to sketch in some land-bridges between the continents
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
M. Victoria Costa (2009). Rawls on Liberty and Domination. Res Publica 15 (4):397--413.
M. Victoria Costa (2009). Rawls on Liberty and Domination. Res Publica 15 (4):397-413.
Blain Neufeld (2013). Political Liberalism and Citizenship Education. Philosophy Compass 8 (9):781-797.
Similar books and articles
Charles Larmore (2003). Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Philip Pettit (2002). Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner. Political Theory 30 (3):339-356.
Lubomira Radoilska (2009). Public Health Ethics and Liberalism. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):135-145.
Eoin Daly (2011). Non-Domination as a Primary Good: Re-Thinking the Frontiers of the 'Political' in Rawls's Political Liberalism. Jurisprudence 2 (1):37-72.
João Cardoso Rosas (2006). Justice and Restrain. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). Liberal and Republican Freedom. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4):418-439.
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Republicanism and Democratic Injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
M. J. Thompson (2013). Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):277-298.
Ruth Abbey (2007). Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families. Political Theory 35 (1):5 - 28.
Alex Sager (2012). Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-23.
Ian Shapiro (1990). J. G. A. Pocock's Republicanism and Political Theory: A Critique and Reinterpretation. Critical Review 4 (3):433-471.
Richard E. Flathman (1996). Liberal Versus Civic, Republican, Democratic, and Other Vocational Educations: Liberalism and Institutionalized Education. Political Theory 24 (1):4-32.
Sebastiano Maffetone (2000). Liberalism and its Critique: Is the Therapy Worse Than the Disease? Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):1-37.
M. Victoria Costa (2013). Is Neo‐Republicanism Bad for Women? Hypatia 28 (4):921-936.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads11 ( #138,953 of 1,103,038 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,017 of 1,103,038 )
How can I increase my downloads?