Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God
Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84 (2011)
|Abstract||In this article, I discuss Leibniz’s interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz’s position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza’s position. First, I analyze Leibniz’s annotations from 1676 on Spinoza’s letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a cause. From these premises, the argument concludes that God must be the uncaused first cause of all things. In letter 12, Spinoza follows Chasdai Crescas and rejects this proof. Instead, he develops a variant of the cosmological argument which depicts God as the self-caused ground of all causes or things. In his annotations, Leibniz agrees with Spinoza about the inadequacy of the traditional argument, but remains ambiguous as to Spinoza’s conception of God as a self-caus|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mogens Lærke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
Mogens Laerke (2011). Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the 'Ethics'. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439 - 462.
David Werther (1996). Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence. Religious Studies 32 (1):37 - 48.
Michael V. Griffin (2012). Leibniz, God and Necessity. Cambridge University Press.
Elliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Brandon C. Look (forthcoming). Existence, Essence, Et Expression: Leibniz Sur 'Toutes les Absurdités du Dieu de Spinoza'. In Pierre-Francois Moreau & Mogens Laerke (eds.), Spinoza et Leibniz.
Robert C. Koons (2008). A New Look at the Cosmological Argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193-212.
Timothy Joe McKenzie, The God of the Cosmological Argument and the God of Religion: Can the Two Be Reconciled?
Ismail Latif Hacinebioglu (2008). Does God Exist? Logical Foundations of the Cosmological Argument. Insan Publ.
Marcy P. Lascano (2011). Emilie du Châtelet on the Existence and Nature of God: An Examination of Her Arguments in Light of Their Sources. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):741 - 758.
Seyed Hassan Hosseini (2011). A Comparative Study on the Degree of Dependence of Clarke's and Sadra's Arguments for the Existence of God on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Hekmat Va Falsafeh 6 (24):53 - 68.
Martin Lin (2007). Spinoza's Arguments for the Existence of God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Mogens Lærke (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-17
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?