David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181 (2003)
In this paper I focus on the discussion between Rawls and Habermas on procedural justice. I use Rawls’s distinction between pure, perfect, and imperfect procedural justice to distinguish three possible readings of discourse ethics. Then I argue, against Habermas’s own recent claims, that only an interpretation of discourse ethics as imperfect procedural justice can make compatible its professed cognitivism with its proceduralism. Thus discourse ethics cannot be understood as a purely procedural account of the notion of justice. Finally I draw the different consequences that follow from this reading
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Claudia Landwehr (2013). Procedural Justice and Democratic Institutional Design in Health-Care Priority-Setting. Contemporary Political Theory 12 (4):296.
Similar books and articles
Emanuela Ceva (2008). Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Jean Keller (2008). Dialogue Among Friends: Toward a Discourse Ethic of Interpersonal Relationships. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 158-181.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Patrick S. M. Primeaux, Ranjan Karri & Cam Caldwell (2003). Cultural Insights to Justice: A Theoretical Perspective Through a Subjective Lens. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):187 - 199.
Axel Seemann (2004). Lifeworld, Discourse, and Realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Truth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4):503-514.
Martin Gustafsson (2004). On Rawls’s Distinction Between Perfect and Imperfect Procedural Justice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):300-305.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads98 ( #15,758 of 1,692,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,402 of 1,692,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?