Legal idioms: a framework for evidential reasoning
Argument and Computation 4 (1):46 - 63 (2013)
| Abstract | (2013). Legal idioms: a framework for evidential reasoning. Argument & Computation: Vol. 4, Formal Models of Reasoning in Cognitive Psychology, pp. 46-63. doi: 10.1080/19462166.2012.682656 | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJean-François Bonnefon (2013). Formal Models of Reasoning in Cognitive Psychology. Argument and Computation 4 (1):1 - 3.
York Hagmayer & Ralf Mayrhofer (2013). Hierarchical Bayesian Models as Formal Models of Causal Reasoning. Argument and Computation 4 (1):36 - 45.
Andrew J. B. Fugard & Keith Stenning (2013). Statistical Models as Cognitive Models of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Argument and Computation 4 (1):89 - 102.
Sangeet Khemlani & P. N. Johnson-Laird (2013). The Processes of Inference. Argument and Computation 4 (1):4 - 20.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Philip M. Fernbach & Bob Rehder (2013). Cognitive Shortcuts in Causal Inference. Argument and Computation 4 (1):64 - 88.
Ulrike Hahn, Adam J. L. Harris & Mike Oaksford (2013). Rational Argument, Rational Inference. Argument and Computation 4 (1):21 - 35.
Norman Fenton, Martin Neil & David A. Lagnado (2013). A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks. Cognitive Science 37 (1):61-102.
Jon Williamson, Jan-Willem Romeijn, Rolf Haenni & Gregory Wheeler (2008). Logical Relations in a Statistical Problem. In Benedikt Lowe, Jan-Willem Romeijn & Eric Pacuit (eds.), Proceedings of the Foundations of the Formal Sciences VI: Reasoning about probabilities and probabilistic reasoning. College Publications.
Carole D. Hafner & Donald H. Berman (2002). The Role of Context in Case-Based Legal Reasoning: Teleological, Temporal, and Procedural. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3).
Neil MacCormick (2005). Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford University Press.
H. Prakken & G. Sartor (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-05-27Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
