David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law Society Gazette 101:12 (2004)
The Mental Incapacity Bill not only paves the way for euthanasia, but invites wholesale abuse and homicide, writes Jacqueline Laing. On 19 October 2004, when the Mental Capacity Bill was at its crucial committee stage, the Law Society issued a statement of ‘strong support’, claiming that it empowers patients and in no way introduces euthanasia. Laing argues that the Bill threatens the incapacitated by granting a raft of new third parties power to require that health professionals withhold ‘treatment’, which, after the controversial decision in Airedale NHS Trust v Bland  AC 789, includes food and fluids delivered both by tube and, in certain cases, by spoon. The Bill further endangers the vulnerable, first, by allowing non-therapeutic research on the non-consenting mentally incapacitated, in breach of the Nuremberg Code and First Declaration of Helsinki, and secondly, by permitting new agents power to undertake on people with learning disabilities certain questionable procedures currently authorised by the High Court, such as non-voluntary sterilisation.
|Keywords||Non-therapeutic research Nuremberg Code Dehydration to death|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jacqueline A. Laing (2004). Mental Capacity Bill - A Threat to the Vulnerable. New Law Journal 154:1165.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2005). The Mental Capacity Bill 2004: Human Rights Concerns. Family Law Journal 35:137-143.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2002). Vegetative State – The Untold Story. New Law Journal 152:1272.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2008). Food and Fluids: Human Law, Human Rights and Human Interests. In C. Tollefsen (ed.), Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. Springer Press. 77--100.
Hans-Martin Sass (1983). Reichsrundschreiben 1931: Pre-Nuremberg German Regulations Concerning New Therapy and Human Experimentation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):99-112.
Norman Ford (2007). Stop Press: Human Cloning Bill in Victorian Parliament. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):12.
Shawn Fabrice Jotterand, Archie M. McClintock, Mustafa A. Alexander & M. Husain (2010). Ethics and Informed Consent of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Vns) for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression (Trd). Neuroethics 3 (1).
Jacqueline A. Laing (2012). Not in My Name. New Law Journal 162:81.
Ray Greek, Annalea Pippus & Lawrence Hansen (2012). The Nuremberg Code Subverts Human Health and Safety by Requiring Animal Modeling. BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):16-.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2012). Institutionalising Murder. Halsbury's Law Exchange.
Randolph Smoak (2004). Placebo: Its Action and Place in Health Research Today. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):9-13.
Brian Pollard (2010). Fatal Licence: Commentary on the 'Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care (Voluntary Euthanasia) Amendment Bill 2008'. [REVIEW] Bioethics Research Notes 22 (2):19.
Christian Hick (1998). Codes and Morals: Is There a Missing Link? (The Nuremberg Code Revisited). [REVIEW] Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (2):143-154.
Jennifer Moore (2013). Proposed Changes to New Zealand's Medicines Legislation in the Medicines Amendment Bill 2011. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):59-66.
Zac Alstin (2012). Volume 22 Issue 3 - 'Apres Moi Le Deluge'. Bioethics Research Notes 22 (3):42-.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-15
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?