David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 79 (3):361 - 392 (1989)
In trying to make discoveries, we are trying to uncover knowledge of HIDDEN realities. It appears impossible to uncover knowledge of hidden realities. How can we evaluate results? (How can we find out whether they are true or even good approximation when we cannot compare them to the hidden realities?) But we are often able to do things which appear impossible; it depends on whether we have chanced onto, or discovered, or invented, the relevant OPERATING PRINCIPLES. It appeared impossible to fly to the moon in one lifetime. We discovered the principle of the rocket. If we can discover the operating principle for making discoveries, we know how we make discoveries. In this paper, I show step by step how we can discover this operating principle.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. N. Hattiangadi (1983). To Save Fallibilism. Mind 92 (367):407-409.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996/2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Tyrone Lai (1988). Empirical Tests Are Only Auxiliary Devices. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):211-223.
Tyrone Lai (1984). The Philosophical Relevance of 'Technically Good' Experiments. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):156-159.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Augustine Brannigan (1981). The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge University Press.
Robert T. Pennock (2000). Can Darwinian Mechanisms Make Novel Discoveries?: Learning From Discoveries Made by Evolving Neural Networks. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 5 (2):225-238.
Eric Dietrich, Arthur B. Markman & Michael Winkley (2003). The Prepared Mind: The Role of Representational Change in Chance Discovery. In Yukio Ohsawa Peter McBurney (ed.), Chance Discovery by Machines. Springer-Verlag, pp. 208-230..
Pio García (2009). Discovery by Serendipity: A New Context for an Old Riddle. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 11 (1):33-42.
H. R. Hall (1907). The Discoveries in Crete The Discoveries in Crete and Their Bearing on the History of Ancient Civilization. By Prof. R. M. Burrows. London : Murray. Pp. 244. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (08):237-239.
Wei-Min Shen (1995). The Process of Discovery. Foundations of Science 1 (2):233-251.
C. G. Hardie (1936). Recent Discoveries in Rome A. W. Van Buren : Ancient Rome as Revealed by Recent Discoveries. Pp. Xvi + 200 ; 9 Plates, 2 Plans. London : Lovat Dickson, 1936. Cloth, 6s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (05):190-.
Robert G. Hudson (2001). Discoveries, When and by Whom? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):75-93.
Kevin Magill (1992). Epicurus, Determinism and the Security of Knowledge. Theoria 58 (2-3):183-196.
Tyrone Lai (1991). Discovery as a Problem for the Inventor. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):327-337.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #221,007 of 1,696,172 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #239,057 of 1,696,172 )
How can I increase my downloads?